Independent Third-Party Evaluation · Quarterly Tracking

Tracking the
risk frontier of AI
Tracking the

risk frontier of AI

Quarterly capability and safety benchmarking, red-team testing and risk-index tracking across five risk domains, covering – frontier models from – organizations.

Frontier Risk Index · Quarterly Trend
Covering – models / – orgs Evaluating – benchmarks Risk Index v2.1
Scroll for domain details
0
Models
Continuously tracked, +– added in 2026 Q3
0
Model Developers
Leading AI labs in China, the US & Europe
0
Risk Domains
Capability × safety dual dimensions
0
Benchmarks
Incl. compositional red-team attacks
0
Quarterly Reports
Regular updates on key findings
01 / FEATURED WORK

Featured Work

WORK — 01
Featured Research

The Safety–Openness Pareto Frontier

We build an openness-and-safety profile for frontier models by scoring them on both their openness and safety, identifying Pareto-frontier models that are both open and safe as a reference for safety efforts in the open-source ecosystem.

View details →
WORK — 02
In-house Evaluation Technology

Red-Teaming Framework

Our in-house red-teaming framework independently combines risk datasets × attack methods × scorers, turning attack methods from papers into reproducible evaluation tools. This figure compares safeguard scores for each family's latest model under no attack vs. red-team attack scenarios.

Explore red-teaming →
WORK — 03
Leaderboard

AI Lab Rankings

Each lab's latest flagship model, ranked by either average risk index, capability score or safety score. The most capable models are not necessarily the riskiest: safeguards play a mitigating role.

See full rankings →
WORK 01 — SAFETY-OPENNESS PARETOLatest Data
02 / RISK DOMAINS

Five Risk Domains